employee
Kazan, Kazan, Russian Federation
employee
Cerkezkay, Turkey
employee
Istanbul, Turkey
employee
Istanbul, Turkey
employee
Branch of FGBU “Central Research and Design Institute of the Ministry of Construction of Russia” Far Eastern Research, Design and Technological Institute of Construction
employee
Vladivostok, Vladivostok, Russian Federation
employee
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
employee
Kazan, Kazan, Russian Federation
666.9.033
61.35
08.02.03
383
6027
3D printing, which appeared in the 1980s, is now widespread in all spheres of life. Many researchers are revolutionizing the construction of buildings using 3D printing technology. The main operational parameters of 3D printing are short setting time, fast curing, good machinability, thixotropy, high compressive and bending strength. According to modern research, geopolymers are more suitable for this purpose by their properties than any other material. Geopolymers can be an alternative to Portland cement in terms of their physical and mechanical properties and make it easy to achieve the desired parameters without adding any expensive components and obtain even better properties in terms of fire resistance, chemical resistance, water resistance and heat resistance. On the other hand, geopolymers can be considered as an environmental restoration tool due to lower CO2 emis-sions, lower energy costs for their manufacture, and the possibility of using by-products in their production. The purpose of this review is to explore the potential of using geopolymers for 3D printing. To do this, firstly, the article discusses the prospects for using 3D printing technology, and then focuses on printed geopolymer solutions. As a result of the review, it is shown that 3D printing technology, primarily for housing construction, will expand, and geopolymers may be very promising for this.
3D printing, housing, geopolymer, mortar, fly ash, methacaolin, blast furnace slag, red sludge, galloisite.
1. Grand View Research. 3D Printing Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Component (Hardware, Software, Services), by Printer Type, by Technology, by Software, by Application, by Vertical, by Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2022-2030., (2022). https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/3d-printing-industry-analysis.
2. J. Davidovits, Geopolymer chemistry & applications, 2015.
3. A.C.C. Trindade, F. de Andrade Silva, W.M. Kriven, Me-chanical behavior of K-geopolymers reinforced with silane-coated basalt fibers, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 104 (2021) 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17446.
4. T. Jiang, Z. Liu, X. Tian, J. Wu, L. Wang, Review on the im-pact of metakaolin-based geopolymer’s reaction chemistry, nanostructure and factors on its properties, Constr. Build. Ma-ter. 412 (2024) 134760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134760.
5. R. Fediuk, A. Yushin, Composite binders for concrete with reduced permeability, in: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/116/1/012021.
6. M. Ziada, H. Tanyildizi, M. Uysal, The influence of carbon nanotube on underwater geopolymer paste based on me-takaolin and slag, Constr. Build. Mater. 414 (2024) 135047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135047.
7. S. Singh, A. Kumar, T.G. Sitharam, Experimental study on strength, durability, hydraulic and toxicity characteristics of soil treated with mine tailings based geopolymers for sustain-able road subgrade application, Constr. Build. Mater. 414 (2024) 134894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134894.
8. J. Shi, Y. Shen, W. Zhang, Y. Fu, X. Kong, Effects of three different nanomaterials on the properties and microstructure of sludge based geopolymers, Constr. Build. Mater. 414 (2024) 134965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134965.
9. S. Prasanphan, S. Onutai, N. Nawaukkaratharnant, Influence of partial replacement of calcined red clay by gypsum-bonded casting investment waste on geopolymerization reaction of red clay-based geopolymer, Heliyon. 10 (2024) e24448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24448.
10. S. Sharmin, P.K. Sarker, W.K. Biswas, R.M. Abousnina, U. Javed, Characterization of waste clay brick powder and its effect on the mechanical properties and microstructure of geo-polymer mortar, Constr. Build. Mater. 412 (2024) 134848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134848.
11. N. Makul, R. Fediuk, M. Amran, A.M. Zeyad, S. Klyuev, I. Chulkova, T. Ozbakkaloglu, N. Vatin, M. Karelina, A. Azeve-do, Design Strategy for Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Re-view of Status and Future Perspectives, Crystals. 11 (2021) 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11060695.
12. S. Debbarma, X. Shi, A. Torres, M. Nodehi, Fiber-reinforced lunar geopolymers synthesized using lunar regolith simulants, Acta Astronaut. 214 (2024) 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.11.013.
13. R.S. Fediuk, A.K. Smoliakov, R.A. Timokhin, V.O. Ba-tarshin, Y.G. Yevdokimova, Using thermal power plants waste for building materials, in: IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 2017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/87/9/092010.
14. A. Naghizadeh, L.N. Tchadjie, S.O. Ekolu, M. Welman-Purchase, Circular production of recycled binder from fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 415 (2024) 135098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135098.
15. R. Prakash, N. Divyah, S. Srividhya, S. Avudaiappan, M. Amran, S. Naidu Raman, P. Guindos, N.I. Vatin, R. Fediuk, Effect of Steel Fiber on the Strength and Flexural Characteris-tics of Coconut Shell Concrete Partially Blended with Fly Ash, Materials (Basel). 15 (2022) 4272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124272.
16. A.V. Klyuev, N.F. Kashapov, S.V. Klyuev, R.V. Lesovik, M.S. Ageeva, E.V. Fomina, Development of alkali-activated binders based on technogenic fibrous materials, Constr. Ma-ter. Prod. 6 (2023) 60–73. https://doi.org/10.58224/2618-7183-2023-6-1-60-73.
17. F. Moretti, Concrete Beam Created with 3D Printing, (2015). https://www.3dwasp.com/en/concrete-beam-created-with-3d-printing.
18. B. Jackson, Institute for Advanced Architecture of Cata-lonia Takes a Natural Approach to on Site 3D Printing for Construction, (2017). https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/institute-advanced-architecture-catalonia-takes-natural-approach-site-3d-printing-construction-109897.
19. D. Kruger, Take Me Higher: 3D-Printed Concrete Could Give Wind Turbines a Powerful Lift, (2020). https://www.ge.com/news/reports/take-me-higher-3d-printed-concrete-could-give-wind-turbines-powerful-lift.
20. T. Kellner, Fit to Print: GE is Looking at 3D-Printing Wind Turbine Towers from Concrete for More Efficient Wind Farms, (2023). https://www.ge.com/news/reports/fit-to-print-ge-is-looking-at-3d-printing-wind-turbine-towers-from-concrete-for-more.
21. M. Fulcher, Chinese Firm 3D Prints Villa and Apartment Block, (2015). https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/archive/chinese-firm-3d-prints-villa-and-apartment-block.
22. M. Starr, 3D-Printed Apartment Building and Mansion (Pictures), (2015). https://www.cnet.com/pictures/3d-printed-apartment-building-and-mansion-pictures.
23. M. Kremenetsky, 3D Printed Farmhouse Unveiled in Chi-na Ahead of 2022 Winter Olympics, (2021). https://3dprint.com/287286/3d-printed-farmhouse-unveiled-in-china-ahead-of-2022-winter-olympics/amp.
24. AICT, Wujiazhuang Village, (2021). https://www.aictbuild.com/wujiazhuangvillage.
25. 3D Sourced. The 12 Most Exciting 3D Printed House Builds 2022, (2021). https://www.3dsourced.com/guides/3d-printed-house-2.
26. S. Nikolopoulos, Construction Completed on Largest 3D-Printed Building in The World, (2020). https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/construction-completed-on-largest-3d-printed-building-in-the-world.
27. A. Anre, World’s Largest 3D Printed Building – Dubai’s Municipality Building., (2021). https://www.prodyogi.com/2021/07/worlds-largest-3d-printed-building.html.
28. N. Zherebtsov, The Largest in The World 3D-Printed Building was Made in Dubai, (2020). https://www.manufacturingtomorrow.com/article/2020/01/the-largest-in-the-world-3d-printed-building-was-made-in-dubai/14634.
29. Apis Cor, (2019). https://apis-cor.com/2019/12/19/dubai-unveils-the-worlds-largest-3d-printed-building-by-apis-cor.
30. B. Loker, World’s First 3D-Printed House Springs Up in Russia in 24hrs, (2017). https://www.dwell.com/article/worlds-first-3d-printed-house-springs-up-in-russia-in-24hrs-d71031f4.
31. 3D Today. V Tatarstane Stroyat Poselok s 3D-Pechatnymi Domami, (2022). https://3dtoday.ru/blogs/news3dtoday/v-tatarstane-stroyat-poselok-s-3d-pecatnymi-domami.
32. Kvadrum3d. Kottedzhnyi Poselok KVADRUM Unikalnye Doma, Sozdannye 3d-Printerom, (2022).
33. ICON. The Chicon House, (2018). https://www.iconbuild.com/projects/chicon-house.
34. M. Saxton, 3D-Printed House in Austin, Texas, (2020). https://www.buildwithrise.com/stories/3d-printed-house-austin-texas.
35. Businesswire. Mighty Buildings Completes World’s First 3D-Printed Zero Net Energy Home, Announces B2B Strategy Expansion to Accelerate Growth, (2022). https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221011005971/en/Mighty-Buildings-Completes-World’s-First-3D-Printed-Zero-Net-Energy-Home-Announces-B2B-Strategy-Expansion-to-Accelerate-Growth.
36. UvEb Technology. Mighty Buildings’ 3D-Printed Sustain-able Homes, (2022). https://uvebtech.com/articles/2022/mighty-buildings-3d-printed-sustainable-homes.
37. M. Aysha, Mighty Buildings, 3D Printing Houses on the Spot, (2020). https://www.3dnatives.com/en/mighty-buildings-interview-051020205.
38. K. Mazade, Mighty Buildings Completes 3D-Printed Net-Zero Home in Southern California, (2022). https://www.dezeen.com/2022/11/04/mighty-buildings-worlds-first-3d-printed-zero-net-home-california.
39. SQ4D. Largest 3D Printed House as of August 2022, (2022). https://www.sq4d.com/islandia-print.
40. RiceHouse. GAIA – 3D Realization, (2018). https://www.ricehouse.it/en/storie/gaia.
41. WASP. TECLA, (2021). www.3dwasp.com/casa-stampata-in-3d-tecla.
42. K. Hui, Tecla is the First 3D Printed House Made of Raw Earth in Ravenna, (2021). https://www.yellowtrace.com.au/tecla-first-3d-printed-raw-earth-house-sustainable-architecture-techology.
43. C. Clarke, French BatiPrint3D Project to Construct House with “Inside-Out” 3D Printing., (2017). https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/french-batiprint3d-project-construct-house-inside-3d-printing-110099.
44. T. Vialva, A French Family is the First to Move into A 3D Printed House., (2018). https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/a-french-family-is-the-first-to-move-into-a-3d-printed-house-135881.
45. G. Woodford, COBOD Welcomes Explosive Growth and Second Year of Profitability, (2021). https://www.aggbusiness.com/ab7/news/cobod-welcomes-explosive-growth-and-second-year-profitability.
46. PERI Builds the First 3D-Printed Apartment Building in Germany, (2020). https://www.peri.com/en/company/press-releases/peri-builds-the-first-3d-printed-apartment-building-in-germany.html.
47. S. Kety, Remember “Project Milestone”? One of the First 3D Printed Houses is Over and First Residents Received Key., (2021). https://3dadept.com/remember-project-milestone-one-of-the-first-3d-printed-houses-is-over-and-first-residents-received-key.
48. S. Fourtané, 3D-Concrete-Printing Smart Housing for Smart Cities in The Netherlands., (2018).
49. D. Malone, The World’s First 3D Printed School Com-pletes in Malawi, Africa, (2021). https://www.bdcnetwork.com/worlds-first-3d-printed-school-completes-malawi-africa.
50. E. Pollock, Formerly Homeless Man Becomes First Us Res-ident of 3D Printed Tiny Home, (2021). https://3dprint.com/280234/formerly-homeless-man-becomes-first-us-resident-of-3d-printed-tiny-home.
51. B. Khoshnevis, An Appeal to Readers of Founder, Presi-dent, and CEO of Contour Crafting Corporation, (2017). https://www.contourcrafting.com.
52. D. Andresen, Hempcreate: The Art of Hemp Based Geopol-ymer Extrusion., (2014). https://geopolymer.org/fichiers/gpcamp-2014.
53. A. Dudnikov, A. Reggiani, M. Dudnikova, The Application of Geopolymer Concrete in the First Mobile 3D-Printer for Buildings Construction, (2016). https://geopolymer.org/fichiers/gpcamp-2016.
54. B. Panda, Development of 3D-Printed Geopolymer Cement for Sustainable Construction, (2016). https://geopolymer.org/fichiers/gpcamp-2016.
55. G. Franchin, H. Elsayed, P. Scanferla, A. De Marzi, F. Gob-bin, L. Zeffiro, A. Conte, A. Italiano, P. Colombo, Direct and Indirect 3D Printing with Geopolymers, (2016). https://geopolymer.org/fichiers/gpcamp-2016.
56. S. Ma, S. Fu, S. Zhao, P. He, G. Ma, M. Wang, D. Jia, Y. Zhou, Direct ink writing of geopolymer with high spatial reso-lution and tunable mechanical properties, Addit. Manuf. 46 (2021) 102202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102202.
57. S. Pilehvar, V.D. Cao, A.M. Szczotok, M. Carmona, L. Val-entini, M. Lanzón, R. Pamies, A.L. Kjøniksen, Physical and mechanical properties of fly ash and slag geopolymer concrete containing different types of micro-encapsulated phase change materials, Constr. Build. Mater. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.016.
58. J. Archez, S. Maitenaz, L. Demont, M. Charrier, R. Mesnil, N. Texier-Mandoki, X. Bourbon, S. Rossignol, J.F. Caron, Strategy to shape, on a half-meter scale, a geopolymer compo-site structure by additive manufacturing, Open Ceram. 5 (2021) 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2021.100071.
59. A. Rintala, J. Havukainen, M. Abdulkareem, Estimating the Cost-Competitiveness of Recycling-Based Geopolymer Con-cretes, Recycling. 6 (2021) 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6030046.
60. N. Verardi, R. Frezzato, M. Benvenuti, Ferrosialate Geopol-ymer Binder and 3D Printing, (2022). https://geopolymer.org/fichiers/gpcamp-2022.
61. Ibragimov, R.A., Korolev, E.V., Kayumov, R.A., Deberdeev, T.R., Leksin, V.V., Sprince, A. Efficiency of activation of min-eral binders in vortex-layer devices. Magazine of Civil Engi-neering. 2018. 82(6). Pp. 191–198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18720/MCE.82.17
62. N. Ranjbar, M. Zhang, Fiber-reinforced geopolymer compo-sites: A review, Cem. Concr. Compos. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103498
63. S.V. Samchenko, O.V. Aleksandrova, A.A. Zaitseva Aerated Concrete Based on Cullet and Liquid Glass // Materi-als Science Forum. ISSN: 1662-9752. Volume 974. - 2020. pp. 362-366. - https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.974.362 .
